I had to download it manually from the site. In a related story, the firmware auto-update doesn't work with the A10 in AP mode ("no internet"). Hampton Bay Wired Doorbell White 1003008625 (No Hardware or Instructions). I don't recall it working any better with the initial firmware. Show all HAMPTON BAY Flood Light manuals Garden Houses Models Document Type. Seems like the feature is fully broken, at least in AP mode. The PC I'm using to interact with the A10's web interface isn't plugged into it - it's connected to the R7000 - so it probably shouldn't even be in that list. I had a TiVo box plugged into the A10, but that didn't show up in the Wired Clients list. The only time I've seen anything appear there is when I was using a MacBook Pro to configure the A10 over WiFi. How many devices are connecting to the router at that moment Please verify them on wired/wireless 2.4GHz/wireless 5GHz connection. If it is still the same after 5miniutes, please provide some details to locate the issue: 1. Please referesh the list and check again about 5minutes later. All the devices connected to the A10 (mobile devices, Ring doorbell, Hunter irrigation controller) are working fine they just don't appear in the connected device list. It will take some time for the devices list to be refreshed. If I disable the WiFi radios on the R7000 I can see the devices move to the AP - they appear as wired devices in the connection list on the R7000. Under "wireless clients" it sometimes shows one device but often shows zero. Under "wired clients", I see the router and the PC I'm using to connect to the web interface. (My house is wired I wanted better WiFi downstairs.) I have the device configured in AP mode, DHCP disabled, advertising the same SSID and passwd for 2.4GHz/5GHz bands as the router (Netgear R7000) it's plugged into. I have every intention of migrating to OH2, but as we all know, real life takes priority and finding free time is like playing hide 'n seek with a ghost.I just got a TP-Link Archer A10, updated the firmware to latest (1.0.2 0.9.1 v1000.0 Build 190305 Rel.62969n(5553)). I’ll report back once I find some free time.ĭisclaimer: I’m still rocking OH 1.8.1 at home (if it ain’t broke - don’t fix it … amarite?) and wrote this binding as an exercise to get familiar with OH2 concepts. I’m going to read through all the comments again and poke at the controller API and make a list of interesting properties that should be easy enough to implement given their existence in the UniFi API. I’d be happy to try and extend this to include other client properties and add an additional Thing definition for a UAP, but beyond that, I do not have any USGs or USWs to develop with (though I’d be more than happy to accept donations) However, as I was mainly interested in detecting presence of me and my wife - not to mention it simplified the exercise of writing an OH2 binding from scratch - I focused purely on detecting “wireless clients” with simple “home” vs “away” logic. The only Bridge in this equation should be the UniFi Controller - any additional “pseudo-Bridge” logic should be outside the binding.Īs far as the Thing mappings, there are definitely use cases to extend the existing Thing definition with additional properties, as well as add other UniFi devices like UAPs, USGs, and USWs. If you read the Bridges section of of the Eclipse SmartHome documentation, I think you’ll find that the Controller to Bridge mapping is the correct implementation moving forward. When I first started this binding, the most difficult thing was figuring out the best way to map the UniFi model to the new OH2 model. Hey guys, sorry I haven’t chimed in - life has been busy to say the least.įirst let me say, thank you to everybody that has tested my binding and reported that it’s working - I’m glad to see my efforts have helped others automate all their things! So long story short, it might be a good idea just to keep things simple… For instance a presence detection module, or an security / alarm module, but that is antoher story WHen you need to check multiple states, and also want to know which switch triggered the rule, those rules becomes more or less useless.Īlternatievly I miss some option to develop addons that can be used to add functionality to openHAB. I have had my struggles with plain scripting in openHAB, and my personal conclusion is that it is great for small things, like turning a light on when a door is opened. What I really miss in openHAB 2 is the jsr223 scripting, since I could implement my own scripts, that will add this kind of functionality. Here are estimated requirements of what throughput client devices need to use without declined performance (for more info see here ): Client Application-specific Bandwidth Requirements UniFi’s products are designed and tested to ensure they can provide for this typical use for many clients simultaneously. At least I am unsure if I am trying to implement something that doesn’t belong in a Binding.Īt least if you argue that a binding is nothing more than a adapter to a foreign system and thus just a mapping of data between the foreign ssytem and openHAB, then my suggestion is no go, since it adds new functionality that the system doesn’t have directly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |